Monday, February 15, 2010

Response From A Harvester

"mom" is a drug using teenage mother . This wasnt theft. This was American preemption doing the right thing for the kid. The choice to remove was the correct one. And clearly the "mother" isnt ready to have contact again until she can accept that she had her chance and blew it. She needs to be open to having a role that isnt "mom" if she wants to be in her daughter's life.

Please notice, Dear Reader, that the person here does not give us their name. They like to take anonymous shots...hidden is always better. Look at the attitude here. Comments?

Thought problems: Why are some kids allowed to stay with good relatives and others not while the parent gets it together? And by the way...the state did not take the child from the mother...they told the mother that if she relinquished her parental rights the child would go to the foster licensed grandparents who were already raising her! They took the child from the grandparents. The mother is now off drugs and has graduated. She gave the child up because of a lie. Comments?

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

My heart breaks for these families that are torn apart for whatever reason. Knowing what I do now… I would never call CPS. I would call the police instead if I suspected abuse.

gorillamum said...

Gee, I wonder which branch of DSHS this worker is from! Stealing children is stealing children. You can not sugar coat it. I thought it was a jailable offense! It was in Haiti. But then when we have such a corupt court system what can you expect?

Anonymous said...

It most states what they did is practicing law without a license. In Nebraska they had a case like this where both the father and daughter sued and won damages for this.
See Amanda C. v. Case, 275 Neb. 757, 749 N.W. 2d 429 (2008)

gorillamum said...

I got to thinking, you know those "Alien" movies where the Alien comes in destroying and devouring everything we value. Well, CPS and all other branches of this agency are the "Aliens" we depict in these movies. If the shoe fits as they say. Physically this is a beautiful country. However, the people who let money dictate their lives and destroy others is what makes this an ugly place to live. A Government that works would be a good place to start. I am a firm believer in rules, regulations and accountability held up by the courts. Without it, civilation can not be civil at all.

Anonymous said...

Wouldn't be remotely suprised if the author of the comment is a "social worker" straight out of the DSHS office.

Anonymous said...

Is this person "smart" enough to actually "read" what is written? The mother realized what she had done, relinqished her rights in that her child go to the grandparents! She sacrificed for the wrongs that she did! She should receive a metal of honor! The state "tricked" her! Is this the harvester who is speaking? The one who used the trickery on the defenseless mom? The one who cannot "read." Yet, is a possible social worker? and...with all of the education required of a social worker? Sounds like it. This mom is this child's mother whether you like it or not! God gave her the child, and you have no right to hurt her again and again. Can't you read, see, hear, or feel that mom is suffering? What kind of a cruel being are you? You are pouring salt on her already bleeding wounds for God's sake!

Anonymous said...

So she had her chance and blew it right? No second chances. Now you finally said it. No reunification. The social workers have no intention of reunifying the child/parent relationship, no matter the law, right? Well, at least you admit it now. We have it in writing. Reunification is a "trick" in itself. "So the legislation made a mistake, in this person's mind, in enacting the reunification law at all." I knew it, and believed it.

Anonymous said...

As much as I`ve been heartbroken for the willards,the more I hear about "Lilly`s" MOM the more I feel it best that she be reunited with her child. "Lilly" would be confused for a while because the child was not able to see her mom and may not remember her well. It would be the best gift anyone could give that child. It`s got to be so hard for the willards with their feelings and to have to worry about their daughter and granddaughter`s feelings. There are too many people being hurt. Not all employees with cps are heartless. Let`s pray someone comes onto the case that has a heart and might be able to change things.

Bari Willard said...

As to the above comment....this is Mrs. Willard and we are very close to our daughter. I am actually the one who went to the law library and looked up her right to appeal.I helped her fill out all the forms. We would be thrilled if Lilly was re-united with our daughter.... that is the way it should be. We still would see her very often. We stay very close as a family... that is something DSHS has used against us. All we ask is that she come back to our family....the one she loves and wants to be with. Her last visit with us she cried to talk to her mommy. DSHS will not let her have any contact at all.

Anonymous said...

Dear Bari,
You responded to my comment. I figured you would want Lilly with your daughter and that`s how it should be. Lilly`s case shows that nothing is changing within the system. I hope you pursue media attention. Don`t give up hope!! If I remember right, Alexis Stuth didn`t return home for 18 months. There is a huge prayer chain going for your family. Good will prevail. Just don`t let it rest as I`m sure you won`t. I`m sure there are a lot of people wondering what they can do to help. Why not get a big rally together? I would be there!!