Monday, October 13, 2008

Doesn't ANYONE Control DSHS????

I received a personal email (to my non-office account) from Robin Arnold Williams, head of DSHS, two weeks ago....

She said that Lisa's "goodly" (my term...no one at DSHS seems to like biological relatives) grandparents would have regularly scheduled monthly visits with the grand-daughter they had raised for a year and a half.

The grandparents are thrilled with being able to see their grand-daughter...even if for just an hour a month.

I wasn't happy that these visits had been purposefully and largely withheld for the last 14 months...and that they would be limited to one visit a month. These supervised visits are one hour each.(The grandparents have had five visits in 14 months.)

NOTE: REMEMBER...THE GRANDPARENTS HAVE DONE NOTHING WRONG!!!!! NEITHER HAS THE MOTHER TO WARRANT PERMANENTLY TAKING HER CHILD.

SUMMARY: The head of the Department of Social and Health Services writes a state senator and says the grandparents will now, after 18 months, have monthly visits. A...n...d..(drum roll here but no real surprises)... When the grandparents called to set up the visits....they were denied!

A recently released Child Protective Services employee called the division of Child Protective Services fascist. No kidding.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

What a disgrace. It doesn't matter if they "like " the biological family...there are laws in place for children. Those laws are meant to protect and keep children safe. How on earth can they play God in a childs life? Family is suppose to be considered first. That is the reason for homestudies and backround checks. Of course some people think they are above the law and as long as it isn't their family member, why follow them. You can rest assured those laws would be in place and followed if it were their grandchild. They continue to play God on the path of destruction Monday through Friday.(sometimes they are in the office on Fridays even though they don't feel the need to answer the phone or return calls EVER)

cc Tillett said...

The "department" has no checks and balances, although they will lead you to believe that there are.

Constituent Relations only helps the Department not get sued.

The Ombusmans office has no teeth.

Our legislatures don't have time to listen to their constituents. They may feel that these are isolated cases. I assure you that they are not.

This is an entity that is Hell bent to ruin American families all for their federal funding. All one needs to do is follow the money.

I am not saying that some children do not need to be removed for their own safety.

They not only PLAY GOD, but many are liars also. All one needs to do is to attend these Kanagroo courts and witness for themselves what goes on.

These cases are only as good as the public pretender that is assigned to their case, because they have no money for legal representation..also paid by the state, as are all of their vendors. They will lie also because they do not want to be out of all that free money. In other words, they will side with CPS or they will loose their contracts with the state.

All of these fake programs that are set up for parents to do to get their children returned to them. Most parents loose their jobs because they cannot get the time off work to get these things completed. These classes should be offered on the weekends and different times during the day to allow for different work schedules.
When the parents loose their jobs to this insanity, it causes other problems. They may loose housing.
You will never get your kids back if you don't have housing. I am not so sure that much of this is not done on purpose. That purpose would be to get the big bonus of adoption grants..4 to 6 thousand dollars per child and maybe more if they can prove through their falsified documents that the child is somehow disabled. Big dollars there..and guess where all this money comes from..You and I.

We have inside information, that in the departments Monday morning meetings..the question is asked..How many heads do we have..Nice..they refer to OUR CHILDREN as HEADS.

I never thought for a million years that I would witness this type of government gone wrong.

We can only effect change through our Legislatures..if we can get them to understand and listen to what is going on within this "Department" You will meet with much resistance.

Ms. Roach, God Bless You for willing to step into this mess..Consider yourself now hired for the task of educating some of your peers about this mess. I have a feeling that you are a force to be reckoned with.

We do not need more tax dollars for more social workers..we need them to stop needlessly taking children that do not need to be taken.

Time to stop the insanity.

Respectfully,

CC Tillett
Vice-President
Washington Families United
Child and Family Advocate

Anonymous said...

There are so many people out there looking for help and backup on these issues.Senator Nancy Schaefer has exposed alot of this also from Georgia to California.I am proud to know there are so many women out there making a difference and history.Every American should hear these stories and know it could happen to them.Keep going strong because the only backlash you get,is from the wrong.

Anonymous said...

There are so many people out there looking for help and backup on these issues.Senator Nancy Schaefer has exposed alot of this also from Georgia to California.I am proud to know there are so many women out there making a difference and history.Every American should hear these stories and know it could happen to them.Keep going strong because the only backlash you get,is from the wrong.

lilibit said...

Three years ago, the Congressman and legislators from Arizona, New Mexico and California sat and listened as parents, lawyers, a physician, child welfare experts and a foster parent shared horror stories of CPS malpractice. They spoke from a giant horseshoe table (normally used by the City Council) and the lawmakers sat facing them in staff table in front of the stage. Throughout the day, groups of 7 speakers at a time were led up to the horseshoe table and each took their turn speaking for 10 minutes. They worked straight through lunch and the lawmakers were very attentive. The hall was packed with an audience -- standing room only -- and four video cameras from assorted media taped the entire thing.

All speakers were harshly negative about CPS. Some of the speeches were very emotional (one played an audio tape into the microphone of a child screaming as police ripped him away from his mother). As part of their presentation, each speaker offered possible solutions (reforms) to the problems many had documented so well. Here are some of the most common themes:

1) Almost all the speakers said that CPS needed to be dismantled and rebuilt. (A view shared by many social work researchers and other published experts).

2) That police assume the role of investigating child abuse. (One lawyer suggested that the social work roles of "helping" and "investigating" should at least be divided and separate -- the same worker should not do both jobs)

3) Funding be changed -- especially Title IV-E funds. The congressman agreed that it needed to be capped and be used by the states for services other than foster care.

4) That parents receive effective legal representation. (Speaker after speaker explained the dismal, sell-out work done by public defenders. Juvenile court judges were called to task.)

5) Almost all speakers wanted all child welfare hearings opened to the public. There were two excellent reports on what had happened in those states that had opened up their courtrooms (none of the CPS, chicken little predictions have proven true.) It was the general feeling that if courtrooms were opened, the public would learn how unjust and abusive the system is to children. It was accurately reported that states who have opened up their juvenile and family courtrooms are experiencing more just, family-friendly procedure and decisions.

6) That anonymous reporting be stopped.

7) Repeal of mandated reporting laws.

8) Removing the qualified immunity protection given CPS caseworkers and imposition of criminal sanctions for perjury, false reporting, holding back favorable information, etc.

9) Rewriting state statutes to clearly define child abuse and child neglect.

10) An investigation into therapist's practice of pseudo-science.

11) Court orders (from an actual judge, not officers of the court) for all removals and the requirement that such "pick up orders" be issued only after a showing of probable cause that actual abuse or neglect has occurred.

12) That the cloak of secrecy be lifted from child protective services (only the child's name and other identifying information should be withheld from the public).

13) That state laws make malicious false reporting a felony punishable by prison time.

14) That CPS workers give a full and complete disclosure of rights and responsibilities to parents at the onset of an assessment or investigation.

One parent was a former Navy Seal. He gave a moving testimony of how all of the rights he thought he once fought for were denied him as a father of a child who was abused by CPS. The man drove out to the conference from the East Coast.

The governor in California has taken seriously the complaints reaching his office from parents across the state. He is committed to using Title IV-E funds to keep families together rather than to fund foster care. The imposition of a totally new family meeting plan piloted with help from a foundation will be funded with Title IV-E, for instance.

He has appointed an ad-hoc commission to develop concrete, action steps to accomplish the mission of reducing foster care incarceration by 60%. The funding change alone should reduce the foster care population by more than that. The commission's position is that patchwork reforms will not work – that a total revamping of the system is required.

While this is referring to discussions of three years ago, the suggestions are still the same. The same revamping of the entire CPS system is long overdue and is warranted now. The same suggestions have been made time and time again, and yet there is no change!

I would further add that the CPS in each state be put under the direct supervision of the States’ Attorneys, thus forcing the state CPS agencies to come to their office with hard corroborating evidence that child abuse or neglect has occurred, and that further abuse or neglect will put the child in harm’s way, thus necessitating the child’s removal from the home. If the children have been removed and they have not brought the state’s attorney the 75% credible evidence proof to him, they must – upon orders of the state’s attorney – return the children at once or face stiff penalties from the state’s attorney’s office.

If the 75% credible evidence has been met, the state’s attorney will recommend to the judge that a pick up order be issued to remove the children from the abusive home. The accused must then stand in a trial-by-jury and have them decide whether or not there any abuse had occurred; and if the evidence if flimsy, the jury will return a verdict of
not guilty, and the children must be returned home at once, with apologies made to the parents by the court, with the further stipulation to the Child Protective Service agency that they will no longer become involved with the interruption in the lives of the innocent parents, thus not only returning physical custody of the children to their parents, but also legal custody of the children – under the threat by the court of a heavy stiff fine if they refuse to obey the decision of the jury and of the court!

The suggestions above will be a start in making the Child Protective Services a more efficiently run organization. Thank you for your time.

lilibit said...

Please view these , I do not come from there but it is happening ALL over the country ......Kentucky video clips

Report Critical of CPS:

http://www.wlky. com/video/ 10726646/ index.html? taf=lou

Target 32 Investigates: Child Protective Services Part 1:

http://www.wlky. com/video/ 14577198/ index.html? taf=lou

Target 32 Investigates: Child Protective Services Part 2:

http://www.wlky. com/video/ 14595359/ index.html? taf=lou

Target 32 Investigates: Child Protective System Part 1

http://www.wlky. com/video/ 9476829/index. html?taf= lou

Target 32 Investigates: Child Protective System Part 2

http://www.wlky. com/video/ 9476789/index. html?taf= lou

Paige Roberts said...

What's so sad is, yes, everyone says that CPS needs revamping but who is doing something about it??????