Friday, August 21, 2009

Reader Gets It Wrong. DSHS Did NOTHING To Reunite Stuth Family

"You would think at some point, the Governor would give a crap.
When, other than the Stuth grandchild, has there been a decent story about DSHS? {This was not a decent story about DSHS. PR} This sick cycle needs to end and children need to be peoples first thought, not an after thought."

"When, other than the Stuth grandchild, has there been a decent story about DSHS? I do not want any of my readers to get the wrong impression. After the judge granted third party custody to the Stuths...after KING5 covered the outcome of the judge's decision...then there was some decent treatment.

But, PLEASE. Get this straight. THE DEPARTMENT DID NOT DO ONE THING TO HELP CORRECT ANY OF THE WRONGS DONE TO THE STUTHS, THEIR GRANDDAUGHTER, OR TO EXTENDED FAMILY THAT WAS PURPOSEFULLY LEFT OUT OF ANY PLACEMENT CONSIDERATION. The state listened to no one. After one 2 1/2 hour meeting a key AG said, "That was a waste of time." (under his breath of course).

Remember Dear Reader...look at what the department does, not what it says. Even after little Alexis (I called her Lisa in the blog) and a one-year-old boy were removed from the foster woman "for cause" on the penultimate day of the termination and placement hearing...the department and the AG continued to argue for termination and placement with the foster woman! (This woman showed up at a hospital in a self-induced stupor and had the baby with her. Fortunately, there were too many mandatory reporters for CPS to shrug off this one!)

The day following the removal was the last day in court. The judge would make his decision. In fact, after the mother's attorney accidentally found out about the removal (the state kept the information from the mother, her attorney, the Stuths and the judge) ...even after Alexis was placed in emergency foster care...the state still argued for placement with the foster woman. They were arguing for Alexis (age 3) to be permanently placed in a dangerous situation! (I had been telling the state it was dangerous for months! I later learned that they knew the foster woman was a problem. The state removed a different child years earlier!)

The state, knowing that Alexis and the baby boy had been removed the night before...argued to the judge when the mother's attorney wanted to inform the court about the removal that it should not be allowed! Judge Ronald Kessler allowed the additional information be entered. He was livid that he had not been told! The state argued then, that the information about the emergency removal was not important to the placement trial!!!! This folks is worse than sick!

To reinforce the fact: The state argued to the judge that he should not be able to hear the information about the dangerous foster woman for whom they were arguing placement. The state did not want the judge to know! The state wanted this toddler in a dangerous home! The state knew about this woman because I told them...ALL of them!!! I was the one who reported the black eye to the police...etc., etc., for many months. The state said the judge should not allow an additional statement from the mother's attorney saying the information had no bearing on the termination and PLACEMENT! Dear Readers....CPS did nothing to help the Stuths and worked against them having their granddaughter up until the very last second. Cyborgs do not give up.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

YOUR RIGHT ON PAM...THE GOV DIDN'T HELP US EITHER...NOR DID SENATORS...SOMETHING GOING ON WHEN NO ONE LISTENS TO THE PUBLIC...WHEN WE LOST OUR GRANDBABY IT WAS THE WORSE DAY OF OUR LIVES...THEY STOLE HIM FROM A MOTHER WHO HAS TURNED HER LIFE AROUND AND DENIED US....WE TALK LET'S DO THE WALK.....TOGETHER..WHERE DO WE START THE FIGHT? I'LL BE THERE!!!

Anonymous said...

I have seen many foster children removed from good relative homes and foster homes after many months or years. I am convinced that the reason the children are being moved is to avoid lawsuits. It has been proven that lack of permanency causes foster children irreparable harm. When a child is adopted by a long time care giver and laws have been broken and services have not been provided, the new parents can then sue the state on behalf of the child. There are definate benefits for the State when they allow the children to be adopted by strangers, who do not know the trauma that they have inflicted on the child. I think that is clear in the case of Shayne Abegg. His attorney points out that each time a foster parent spoke out about the damage done to him, Shayne was moved. The same thing happened to Poca.

Cat said...

OMG! Are you saying that when someone complains about the System, they take the kids away? Now I am wondering if the reason they took my grandniece away after 4 years and in the middle of the adoption period, this is what happened to my grandniece and me, too!

Isn't there any way to stop it? Will I ever get my grandniece back? DSHS says no. I am in agony over this.

Anonymous said...

Yes Cat, the Department believes that might have sued them, once the adoption of your Grandniece was final. Damage was done to the child by not allowing her permanency.

Anonymous said...

Ms. Roach, Is there anything we can do do to help Cat and others?